![]() Needing to score points, the Cardinals went three-and-out. With 4:25 left in the Cardinals the Cardinals needed to do something offensively. Jalin Hyatt had a 31-yard catch on the drive. The Cardinals went three-and-out and then Jones threw his second touchdown pass of the game, an 11-yard pass to Isaiah Hodgins. Jones picked up a couple of first downs with his legs and Darren Waller had catches for 14 and 25 yards. Jones had a nine-yard touchdown pass to Saquon Barkley. Cardinals 28, Giants 21Īfter getting a stop, they went 80 yards in 13 plays. He was ruled out of the rest of the game. Starting guard Ben Bredeson exited the game and was diagnosed with a concussion. The Giants drove 12 plays for 75 yards to add another touchdown, getting a one-yard score from Saquon Barkley. Josh Dobbs threw his first touchdown pass of the season, a three-yard throw to Hollywood Brown.ĭobbs ran in the two-point conversion to give the Cardinals a three-touchdown lead. He was up to 103 rushing yards on 18 carries for the game. They went 75 yards in eight plays, getting big runs from James Conner. The Cardinals didn’t flinch at the New York touchdown. Watkins, in the starting lineup because of injuries, left the game with an arm injury. Two plays later, Jones took it to the end zone himself with a 14-yard run. Daniel Jones opened with a 58-yard bomb to Jalin Hyatt. The Giants struck quickly to start the second half. Prater added three points with a 44-yard field goal with 1:09 left in the half. The Cardinals didn’t do much after the interception, gaining eight yards on six plays, getting hurt by an offensive pass interference penalty on rookie receiver Michael Wilson. He returned it 35 yards to the Giants’ 34. However, a tipped pass landed in the arms of safety Jalen Thompson for an interception. The Giants looked like they had some life on offense, picking up a couple of first downs. We'll take that □♂️ x #BirdGang /hJXGCcX1ci
0 Comments
“People are just less likely to associate with, or relate to, a particular religion.” “In fact, levels of atheism have not grown a great deal in the past 30 years, and stand at under 20%” Woodhead explained. However, the drops in these figures do not signal a correlative increase in levels of atheism. The Church of England, like political parties, is failing to retain or attract young people. Linda Woodhead, Director of Religion and Society at the University of Lancaster, said, “11% of 20 year olds identify themselves as Anglican, compared to 50% of over 60s”. Those who affiliate themselves with the Anglican Church has dropped from 40% to 20% in the same period. The drop is driven by the declining popularity of the Church of England. This fall was not spread over all religions, however. In 1983, 69% classified themselves as “belonging to a religion”, whereas in 2012 this figure was 52%. Over the past 30 years, the hold of that the country’s religious institutions have on the British public has similarly weakened. They need to be far more flexible and dynamic, whilst being willing to give the public hard truths.” Increasing individualism “They’re like dinosaurs from the 19th century trying to play a game they don’t really understand. They are constantly assaulted by various demands, and feel the need to appease ever-multiplying groups of people. Politicians have failed to keep up with this ever-diversifying environment, according to Flinders. “This is counter-productive from a mainstream political point of view.” “Social media, online petitions, pressure groups – everyone feels as if they have an opinion about everything,” Flinders said. The apparent increasing disaffection with politics can be explained by the population’s increasingly diverse interests - and the multiplying avenues through which to express them. Political interest is instead being invested in other areas.” This is not to say that they are not political. “There is a problem of political engagement amongst young people. But the current political model is entirely unsuited to the modern political world.” “Britain is not disengaged from politics. “You have to be very careful about how you interpret this data,” he said. Matthew Flinders, Professor of Parliamentary Governance at Sheffield, explained how this apparent paradox manifests. In 1986, 29% said that they had “a great deal” or “quite a lot” of an interest. While in 1987 nearly half (48%) said they were not a strong supporter of a party, or did not support any party at all, now more than two-thirds (69%) fall into this category.Ĭonversely, more people claim to have an interest in politics, and more feel that they can influence politics. This decline becomes even clearer when you look at how strongly people identify with whichever political party they support. This is mirrored by a decline in party loyalty: in 1983, 87% of the population identified with a political party. Now only 18% of the population trust governments to put the nation’s needs above those of those of a political party, down from 38% in 1986. However, here the BSA reports a clear generational element to the trend, indicating more long-term and pervasive effects. ![]() Like the banking sector, this is a trend that was certainly exacerbated by events - in this case, the 2011 phone hacking scandal. Satisfaction here has seen a more steady downturn - from 47% in 1994, to 39% in 2009, to 27% in 2012. People have many more opinions about banking in general than they do about a particular bank - and these opinions are fuelled by the media.”Īttitudes towards the press have similarly been falling - although not nearly as sharply. “General opinion doesn’t manifest itself in local behaviour. “Public attitudes to the banking sector don’t mirror or dictate attitudes to specific banks,” she said. Elaine Kempson, Emeritus Professor at the University of Bristol, says these figures have not affected habits. This figure does not correlate to a local level, however. This enormous fall has, of course, been driven by the 2008 financial crisis, but there is evidence of a trend too: the figures had already fallen to 63% by 1994. The report found 19% of the UK population thinks that banks are well run, compared with 90% thirty years ago. The figures are most significant in the banking sector. Only the NHS and trade unions have seen increased satisfaction. The 30th British Social Attitudes report, published today, reports decreases in public satisfaction with the government, banks, the press, the police, the BBC, and the Church of England. Perceptions of how well most major British institutions are run have plunged over the past three decades. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |